Court Rejects Musk’s $101B Tesla Pay Package (Again)—DOGE Takes a 3% Dip

  • The court rejected Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation package for the second time.
  • The judge stated that Tesla’s board of directors was unduly influenced to accept the massive payment.
  • Tesla reveals its decision to appeal the court order, addressing the decision wrong.

A judge has rejected Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation package for a second time. This is despite Tesla shareholders voting to reinstate it in June. Judge Kathaleen McCormick blocked the plan, saying Tesla’s board of directors was pressured to accept the massive payment because of Musk’s influence.

This package is now worth $101 billion, based on Tesla’s closing share price Monday. This is a record-breaking pay package for Musk as Tesla’s CEO. Musk is also known for being a Dogecoin (DOGE) advocate.

Through a December 3rd, X post (formerly Twitter), Tesla said the court went against what most shareholders wanted. Shareholders voted twice to give Musk the compensation. Tesla said the court’s decision was wrong and it plans to appeal. Tesla argued that if the ruling is not changed, it would show that judges and lawyers have all the power over Delaware-based companies, taking away power from the companies’ real owners.

Court Says the Package Is Too Much

The judge had already taken away Musk’s Tesla pay package in January, saying it was an “unfathomable sum” that was unfair to shareholders. The pay package was excessive, which could affect Musk’s future at Tesla.

And in the latest court order, Judge McCormick said Musk’s power over the board was a big reason for the compensation deal, and so the terms were not “entirely fair.” She said the company did not fully inform investors before they approved the pay package. The board could have decided on a reasonable compensation amount but instead did what Musk wanted. McCormick said:

“There were undoubtedly a range of healthy amounts that the Board could have decided to pay Musk. Instead, the Board capitulated to Musk’s terms and then failed to prove that those terms were entirely fair.” 

The lawsuit was filed by shareholder Richard Tornetta. Tesla must also pay $345 million in fees to Tornetta’s lawyers. This amount must be paid in cash or company shares.In response to Tesla’s legal loss and aligning with the overall trend, Dogecoin fell by 3.36% over the last 24 hours. However, the token has seen a notable hike of 180% over the last 30 days.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Related Posts

After 3 Years, Aave (AAVE) Surpasses $300 with 22% Surge

AAVE hits $331, driven by whale activity and a drop in coin age, signaling strong growth.   Analysts predict AAVE could reach $1,000, with momentum backed by bullish market signals.   AAVE’s…

World Liberty Financial Bets $12M on Crypto with ETH, LINK, AAVE Buys

Donald Trump’s World Liberty Financial bought $12 million in ETH, LINK, and AAVE. The firm now holds 14,573 ETH, 3.108 million USDT, and 1.515 million USDC. This was the first…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *