• Jeremy Hogan has faulted Better Markets’ Amicus Brief supporting the SEC.
• Hogan thinks Better Markets misconstrued the Trial Judge’s decision.
• Better Markets thinks Ripple’s XRP sales failed the Howey Test.

Foremost civil law attorney Jeremy Hogan has faulted Better Markets’ amicus brief supporting the SEC in the lawsuit against Ripple. Hogan believes the financial organization misinterpreted the trial judge’s ruling in the case and based its filing on the wrong premise. According to Hogan, the trial judge did not rule that XRP sales on exchanges were not sales of securities because buyers didn’t purchase directly from Ripple.

Clarifying the current legal situation between Ripple and the SEC, Hogan explained that the trial judge ruled that Ripple’s programmatic sales were blind bid and ask transactions. He noted that programmatic buyers couldn’t know if their money payments went to Ripple or any other seller of XRP.

Related: Ripple vs. SEC: Why the Appeal Could End in Ripple’s Favor

Hogan further explained the basis of Ripple’s partial victory in the ongoing court case, noting that XRP purchasers didn’t know who they were buying from. Therefore, they couldn’t have relied on the seller to increase the digital asset’s price. Hogan highlighted the references the trial judge attached to his judgment, citing them as facts the judge relied on to establish a ruling on the matter.

Following his analysis of Better Markets’ amicus brief, Hogan concluded that the financial organization dislikes how the trial judge applied the facts to the case. Instead of challenging the judge’s decision directly, the firm is arguing about the result’s correctness, which could expose the crypto community to extensive risks beyond the SEC’s protection if upheld.

Related: SEC Forms Crypto Task Force Led by Hester Peirce: Ripple Reacts

Better Markets filed in support of the SEC in the ongoing case against Ripple over the latter’s XRP sales a few years ago. The non-profit financial-based organization claims that Ripple’s sales of XRP to retail traders fulfilled the third prong of the Howey Test. According to the organization, the ruling favoring Ripple “conflicts with the Supreme Court’s definition of an investment contract in Howey.”